|
June 13,
2006
Vol. 2, No. 10
|
|
Also in
this issue:
Nevada judge copes
with union lawyers
Vegas litigants face
a stacked judicial deck
A judge who doesn't
play fast and loose
For one judge and his friends, one good turn led
to another
Some Nevada judges
lurk beneath the radar
Congress seeks
Internet control
Troops reduce
illegal crossings
Commentary:
Senate bill for illegals
would bloat welfare
Gouging you via CPI creep
Don't believe the
'tough guy' Fed
Re-primitivizing the world
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
Facilitators
Senate bill for illegals would bloat welfare
Largest welfare expansion in 35 Years
By Robert Rector
Human Events
Congress
is in the midst of the most dramatic
overhaul of our nation’s immigration laws in 80
years. So why is hardly anyone asking the basic
question: How might this affect government
costs? In the case of the immigration bill
passed in the Senate, a measure sponsored by
Senators Mel Martinez (R.-Fla.) and Chuck Hagel
(R.-Neb.), we have an answer: It would raise
them substantially.
[continued]
Tax racket
Gouging you
via CPI creep
Why state, local governments love inflation
By Thomas DiLorenzo
Ludwig von
Mises Institute
The single
most important tax reform of the 1980s was the
indexation of the federal income tax to
inflation and the reduction of the number of
federal income tax brackets from fifteen to
three. Prior to that, ordinary middle class
workers were pushed up into higher and higher
tax brackets by simply receiving cost-of-living
pay increases. The result was that a couple of
years of cost-of-living increases actually
reduced your standard of living by diminishing
your overall take-home pay after taxes while
enriching the state.
Under this corrupt scheme the Federal Reserve
would print excessive amounts of money, which
created inflation. The inflation led to
cost-of-living increases that in turn led to
"bracket creep" and higher tax payments. The
federal government's budget became bloated while
the taxpayers suffered. Politicians never had to
take the heat for voting for a tax increase;
inflation did it for them. It was truly a form
of taxation without representation (not that
taxation with representation is any better).
[continued]
The Fed
Don't believe the 'tough guy' Fed
The Federal Reserve is making lots of noise
about getting tough on inflation. Fact is, the
governors desperately want to stop raising
rates.
By Bill Fleckenstein
MSM Moneyl
I have long
maintained that the Fed does not care about
inflation, because it believes in its own
infallibility. I also believe that the Fed will
have no trouble explaining away rising prices.
The Fed has done so throughout its entire
existence (excluding Paul Volcker, of course).
And, since Easy Al Greenspan's tenure began in
1987, the rationalizing has been operating in
overdrive.
Hawk-talk and manliness
Last week, however, the Fed appeared to switch
into vigilante mode. New chief Ben Bernanke's
hawkish-sounding comments on June 5 received
credit for all the selling around the globe. The
next day, St. Louis Fed Chief William Poole
reinforced that tone when he suggested that a
slowing economy alone might not bring inflation
down.
[continued]
Atavism
Re-primitivizing the
world
By Mark Steyn
The New York Sun
Here are four
news stories from the last week:
Baghdad: Abu Musab al-Zarqawi found himself on the
receiving end of 500lbs of US ordnance.
London: Scotland Yard arrested a cell of East End
Muslims allegedly plotting a sarin attack in Britain.
Toronto: The Mounties busted a cell of Ontario Muslims
planning a bombing three times more powerful than
Oklahoma City.
Mogadishu: An al-Qaeda affiliate, the "Joint Islamic
Courts," took control of the Somali capital, displacing
"US-backed warlords." The world divides into those who
think the above are all part of the same story and those
who figure they're strictly local items of no wider
significance deriving from various regional factors:
[continued]
|
|
WHY
BusinessNevada
|
|

|
|
PLANning your life
‘Voter eradication' comes to Nevada
Invited
in by coalition
of state's liberals, unions ’
By Steven Miller
BusinessNevada
ALL ThAT assaultive
harassment of signature gatherers for the Tax & Spending
Control (TASC) initiative was planned and organized by
an aggressively political tax-exempt Nevada non-profit
and national and state Democratic Party operatives,
BusinessNevada has learned.
Details of the physical assaults and threats,
the conspicuous lies, the illegal obstruction of
petitioners and the intimidating and “swarming” of
average citizens were spelled out in extensive and
detailed affidavits filed as exhibits in a Nevada Court
case heard Thursday by District Judge Sally Loehrer (See
District judge corners union lawyers).
According
to
sworn statements
from
multiple witnesses:
“These
blockers will physically put their flyers in front of a
person’s face who is trying to sign the petition. This
stops some of the people from signing.” At the same
time, the blocker “stands very close to the signer and
starts talking very loudly,” over the top of the
petition gatherer, “thus confusing and intimidating the
potential signer. The potential signer, being
intimidated and confused, walks away.”
[continued]
The courts
Nevada judge copes with union lawyers
BusinessNevada
NEVADA DISTRICT JUDGE
Sally
Loehrer last week prohibited tactics used by a
union-backed group to keep voters from access to the
TASC tax-restraint petition.
Although a Las Vegas Review-Journal
headline reported that, “Judge chides ballot groups,”
almost all of the “chiding” by Loehrer was directed at
the so-called “Nevadans for Nevada (NfN)” group and its
bullying tactics on the streets (see
excerpts from petition circulators’ affidavits).
Loehrer did emphasize the First Amendment
rights at Las Vegas petitioning locations of both the
NFN employees and the TASC petition gatherers. But when
NFN attorneys Richard G. McCracken and Thomas F. Pitaro
kept insisting that their clients had a “constitutional
right” to run up on petitioners and the people listening
to them, then loudly interrupt, yelling and putting
their leaflets over the petitions being read, Loehrer
grew impatient.
[continued]
|
Special
report:
Vegas
Juice vs. Justice
A
Los Angeles Times
Investigatory Series
|
Vegas litigants face a stacked judicial deck
Judges
routinely rule in cases involving chums,
ex-clients and business associates -- and in
favor of lawyers who fill their campaign
coffers.
By Michael J. Goodman and William C. Rempel
Times staff
writers
When
Judge Gene T. Porter last ran for reelection, a
group of Las Vegas lawyers sponsored a fundraiser for
him at Big Bear in California. Even by Las Vegas
standards, it was brazen. Some of the sponsors had cases
before him. One case was set for a crucial hearing in
four days....
[continued]
A judge
who doesn't play fast and loose
By Michael J. Goodman
Judge
John S. McGroarty did it differently.
In the last Nevada election in which all
district judgeships in Las Vegas were on the ballot, 13
incumbents ran unopposed. Unlike others, McGroarty
returned his unspent campaign contributions.
"I sent the money back. It wasn't mine to keep,"
McGroarty said in an interview. "I didn't have an
opponent, so I didn't need it. I don't want slush funds
… money burning a hole in my pocket...."
[continued]
For one judge and his friends, one good turn
led to another
James Mahan got his jobs on the state and
federal benches through the connections of old pal
George Swarts. Things turned out well for Swarts too.
By Michael J. Goodman
Without help
from a friend, James Mahan might never have
become a Las Vegas state judge. Certainly he wouldn't
have gotten one of the top judicial jobs in town: a
lifetime appointment to the federal bench.
Then again, without Mahan, his friend George Swarts
would never have gotten to run an Internet porn
business, a hotel-casino hair salon or a Southern
California software company....
[continued]
Some
Nevada judges lurk beneath the radar
Senior
judges are exempt from some rules of accountability. The
careers of three jurists reflect the ethical questions
that can result.
By Michael J. Goodman and William C. Rempel
One Nevada judge
was nearly indicted on blackmail charges. Another
ruled repeatedly for a casino corporation in which he
held more than 10,000 shares. Still another overruled
state authorities and decided in favor of a gambling
boss who was notorious as a mob frontman, and whose
casino did the judge a $2,800 favor.
Yet the
Nevada Supreme Court has conferred upon these judges a
special distinction that exempts them from some of the
common rules of judicial practice and reduces their
accountability. They are among 17 state judges whom the
high court has commissioned as senior judges....
[continued]
|
|
Power grab
Congress seeks
Internet control
Competitive
Enterprise Institute
Congress
is scheduled to vote on a plan for putting the
federal government in charge of regulating Internet
traffic, a plan that will restrict consumer choice and
freedom.
The plan, to be introduced as amendments to the
Communications Opportunity, Promotion, and Enhancement
Act of 2006, would prohibit Internet Service
providers—the owners and developers of the net’s
infrastructure—from charging different prices for
different levels of service. The plan would also prevent
individuals and organizations from setting up private
networks and screening out content they deem
objectionable.
[continued]
National security
Troops reduce
illegals' crossings
Flow shifts to Cal-Mex border
By Olga R. Rodriguez
Associated Press
SAN LUIS RIO COLORADO, Mexico - The arrival of U.S.
National Guard troops in Arizona has scared off illegal
Mexican migrants along the border, significantly
reducing crossings, according to U.S. and Mexican
officials.
U.S. authorities said Monday that detentions along the
U.S.-Mexico border decreased by 21 percent, to 26,994,
in the first 10 days of June, compared with 34,077 for
the same period a year ago.
Along the Arizona border, once the busiest crossing
spot, detentions have dropped 23 percent, according to
the U.S. Border Patrol.
[continued]
|
Subscribe
to
BUSINESSNevada
Know a colleague who’d be interested? Forward
BUSINESSNevada!
Receiving
BUSINESSNevada
via your trade association?
Click here and get it
DIRECT! |
|